The Idea Of Imitation According To Aristotle's "Poetics"

Aristotle had refuted Platos conception of imitation. Plato thought imitation to be a divagation from truth. Aristotle thought imitation to be the re-creation of some affair better than reality. Aristotle in Poetic says: epos verse railroad and Tragedy, as also Comedy, dithyrambic poetry, and most flute-playing and lyre-playing are all, viewed as a whole, modes of imitation. Aristotle does non drive all the types of art. He speaks only of Epic poetry, Tragedy, Comedy, Dithyrambic poetry and Music. Aristotle has equated poetry with music, while Plato has equated poetry with painting. Aristotle in his opinion say that rhyme and Music have a deeper signifi canfulce than painting, which is have-to doe with with what has genuinely happened and with what may happen; not as in Painting which cannot go deep into reality, it is always on the surface. Thats wherefore Aristotle clinches the issue: From what we have said it will be seen that the poets function is to describe, not t he thing that has happened, but a genial of thing which might happen, i.e. what is possible as being apparent or necessary. Poetry, therefore, is the better form of art. It deals with eternal varieties, and not clean facts. It deals with the steadfast human thoughts, feelings and action - the eternal passion, the eternal pain. The poet should assume custody who are better than they are in actual life. A poet is not an imitator. He is a maker. The term imitation is to be taken in the sense of creation making. It should be recall that the poet, who is maker, does not make anything in material terms. It has no full-blooded existence. soon enough something has been made. Such a making is not perceptible; and it can only be realised. Hence Poetry is something more philosophic and of graver import than history, If you want to piss a good essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our! page: cheap essay