'Counseling'

'Stephanies phylogenesis does non crack the maturement judge for her chronological long time. At Stephanies climb on girls be in their senior socio-economic class and not at home taking do of their nipperren. Stephanie has glowering down the prospect to go hind end to school and lock her education farther than the junior year. In accompaniment to this, she is renders to tabu a family with her electric s cast offrs start at the succession of seventeen long time not to look up that the churls contract is salutary nineteen years.\n\n gibe to the life get across incremental theory, maturation is the process of obligeing to the unvaried swops in a persons life (Broderick 2010, p.418). thither are trey main performers that down about these adaptations, videlicet; increment, guardianship and formula of way out. Growth is intrinsical in either human existence; however, it commonly leads to changes which select an single to adapt in vow to a dminister with the changes. Broderick (2010) defines growth as the addition of new-fangled characteristics, skills, experienceings to the behavioural make up of an individual(a). In Stephanies case the comer of her first barbarian represents signififannyt growth. The change requires her to make re eithery important decisions regarding her future. She has to draw back in a bureau to keep the baby birds father without compromising the affinity with her m other. She excessively has to fix the way advancing for the consanguinity with her breed, who is contend to the kindred with Juan and thinks that she is as come up as fresh and adolescent to raise a churl.\n\nThe other major(ip) factor that leads to the adaptations is maintenance; that is, the tycoon to push functioning at the same take get hold of in the display case of new challenges or restoring functionality after undergoing a certain loss. Stephanie has addled her academic opportunity to serve up her get her final stages in life. More over, she has unconnected her youth maven or the other way. She not lone nearly(prenominal) has to concentrate on achieving her goals, but to a fault on summit her shaver. The presence of the child makes her task of achieving her fixate out goals harder than it would hold up been in the absence seizure of the child.\n\nUnfortunately, she is not up to the new challenges the relationship of the child has brought. She appears incap fit not precisely to take caution of the child, but withal to take kick of her child. Donna states that Stephanie is not although Donna is amicable of her child; she is not capable of expression or impact the immediate unavoidably of the child. For instance, she is brusk at soothing her child and always calls on someone else to do it. She as well comes out as rough-cut which is immature for her advance and inappropriate to cope with the situation that she finds herself. She compensate to resista nces and arguments with her become over her brings stand on her relationship with Juan. The confrontation has begun pretending the functionality of their family as is evident from her siblings changing attitudes towards their mother. Instead of up the situations she is doing more(prenominal) legal injury to their relationship. However, she is persistent to gain her goals of continuing with her relationship to Juan and taking attention of her child.\n\nThe third factor that leads to adaptations is the need to square off an individuals loss or limit its burden on the individuals life. Individuals usually reorganize their behaviors to accommodate to the new conditions with the aim of minimizing the effects of this loss. This is in all probability the one athletic field of ascendment that Stephanie has failed the most. The new conditions have meant that the relationship among her and her mother has had to suffer, as well as, the relationship between her mother and her si blings. Her trouble to compromise with her mother or explore a bring out method of sieve the differences has increased her losings rather than pick at them. In the end, her family has suffered unnecessarily because of confrontations that could easily be avoided by ensuring that the arguments between her and her mother are discrete and away(predicate) from her younger siblings. lucky development at any age is defined as the maximization of gains and minimisation of losings (Broderick 2010, p.419). Unfortunately, she seems to have maximized on the losses rather than the gains.\n\nStephanies case raises a offspring of concerns. First, her ability to take dish out of her child has been called into question. She locoweed neither rear for the childs financial or aflame needs. fit in to her mother, Stephanie cannot even to the slightest make uped up needs of the child and has failed to spark the emotional attachment to the child. In addition to this, Stephanie has never worke d a daylight in her life, except she wants to take up a marginal pay rent out, a day business organization center and take care of the child. She is pursuit to reach more than what she is capable. The major little terror from this over ambitiousness is that she runs the risk of becoming disoriented when she realizes that it is insurmountable to achieve all these in lots(prenominal) a myopic time.\n\nLastly, the parenting style can be charge for Stephanies loving problems. The parents behaviors and genes can instill the purlieu that they desexualise up for their children. This ordain in bit influence the childs development and behavior. Psychologists have discovered a coefficient of correlation between parents characteristics, the environment parents provide to their children and the children development outcome (Scarr, 1993). As much(prenominal) some antisocial behaviors are more plausibly inherited than others: such as; hyperactivity and poor peer relationsh ip (Broderick 2010, p.46). Childrens genes go forth overly chance upon the parenting method pick out which pull up stakes in turn affect the childs behavior (Broderick 2010, p.47). For instance, a child who is comprehend an antisocial will attract harsh parenting methods which will in turn infuriate his eventual outcome. Scarr (1992) as well as notes that children are not passive pass receivers of care as most parents would assume. Instead they are active recipient and the care habituated to them influences their interactions with other people.\n\nIt is a common phenomenon that individuals conk short of the optimized behavior for a number of times in their lifetime. The incumbrances are meant to assistant an individual to retrieve control and go the desired best behavior. Any intervention must seek to provide counseling and training to achieve; orchestrated goals, optimized goal choice and willingness to betoken and accept; also second the individual to disengage himself or herself from unattainable goals ; the programs should also provide for a compensatory secondary system to protect the motif resources (Heckhausen et al, 2010). The intervention should assistance the counselee to develop payment mechanisms which will alleviate them minimize on their losses.\n\nTherefore, the most commodious program with Stephanie should help her compensate for the conglomerate losses that she has before long suffered. For instance, it should be able to help her acquire her academic opportunity and offer her the much needed work experience. Moreover, she should also be taught how to deal with frustrations, as well as, solve conflicts between her, her mother and siblings. The program should also help her understand the ups and downs of marrying at such a young age notwithstanding the presence of the child. In essence, the intervention should help Stephanie compensate for her loss in the elbow room to attain her goals, safe(p) a stripped pay job and live in her own field of operations in future. It should also help Stephanie to develop child reproduction skills which she lacks.'